|
Archive for the ‘WTC7’ Category
I believe the first place I encountered this meme was during the June 2005 Coast to Coast AM 911 Roundtable discussion wherein Peter Lance floated the idea that WTC7 was pre-wired for demolition because of its National Security import.
Then I came across this reference which is actually fairly early on in the post 911 era … EXPLOSIVES PUT IN WTC CONCRETE WHEN CONSTRUCTED-1 Posted By: Jedediah_Smith
And now there is this recent thread and audio at www.BreakForNews.com …
Here are posts by others and myself about it back in 2005 on the 911 Truth Action yahoogroup:
Claim: Silverstein Warned Not To Come To Work On 9/11 Apparently silverstien had a “doctors appointment” on the morning of 9/11 which meant he was absent from his office on 9/11, also both his son and daughter were “late for work” that morning, so they to were also absent from there offices. (8:00 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Larry Silverstein Doesn’t go to WTC Due to Doctor’s Appointment Submitted by Reprehensor on Mon, 04/02/2007 - 2:31pm. Making the Evidence Fit
The above image consists of two shots of WTC7 taken on 9/11. The Left photo is attributed to the NYPD, and is used by NIST as corroboration for eyewitness testimony that suggests that debris from the collapse of the towers caused a specific amount of damage to WTC7. The photo on the Right is by Aman Zafar. The discrepancy is obvious, Zafar’s photo does not confirm the visual data in the NYPD photo. Researchers should petition NIST for provenance on this photo. If the photo was taken with a digital camera as other helicopter shots from 9/11 were, then Exif data should be embedded in the file that will reveal a time-stamp. The original file should also reflect what we see in the NIST drafts, and not bear evidence of tampering in Photoshop or other image editing software. A separate inquiry to the NYPD probably wouldn’t hurt. (If you have a connection there, use it.) Vesa blogged this item yesterday and invites observations and input. truth911.net also blogged it and there is good information in the comments section below the blog entry. DanR over at the Randi Rhodes Message Board posted about this back in December of 2006, after seeing a post here, and that’s where I cribbed the source files for the graphic above. But if it wasn’t for “Winston Smith”, and his article, Photographic Analysis of Damage to WTC7 and Critical Errors in NIST’s Estimations, posted last October, maybe nobody would have noticed this one.
Discovery of directed 9/11 dialectic Recent research reveals the WTC “controlled demolition” debate has been a constructed Hegelian dialectic since no later than 9/12 2001. For it was on that day that one Van Romero, of New Mexico Tech, announced in the local Albuquerque Journal that the Twin Towers were obviously taken out by a conventional controlled demolition. Romero quickly and quietly retracted his claim and disappeared from the scene. What was not revealed until now however, is that Romero is a major player in directed-energy weaponry, and a long time member of the Directed-Energy Professional Society (See 911researchers.com). By planting the “controlled demolition” meme, Romero took eyes away from exotic and specifically directed-energy weapons’ role in the destruction of the World Trade Center Complex.How serendipitious, then, that Romero should also resurface this very weekend on the Discovery Channel of all places. Romero received special thanks for, and his Department presided over, something called “Conspiracy Test” — an examination of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
As OKBOMB is increasingly understood as 9/11 writ small, cursory reexamination yields the telltale signs of directed-energy weapons there too — the powderized concrete, cylindrical cut-out patterned damage, and even scorch marks left on the roof by the earlier prototype of the weapon. Romero’s constructed dialectic eschewed such anomalies however, restricting the acceptable frame of debate to truck-bomb vs column-bomb. So it should be little surprise then that even as Romero’s documentary premiered on Discovery, Discovery cameras were in Austin, Texas to tape a purportedly scientific presentation hewing to a similarly circumscribed 9/11 debate. For, as a result of an elaborate and targeted psychological operation aimed at leaders of the “patriot” community in the Austin area, the leading “scientific” figure speaking at the University of Texas conference came from the same 33o exo-weaponry milieu as Romero. Thus, any presentation by Discovery will be similarly restricted, between the ridiculous official theory(/ies) and the equally ludicrous “superthermate” theory. Such false opposition keeps activists’ heads spinning on an untraceable thermite goose chase rather than agitating for grand-jury investigations of institutions such as Raytheon, Applied Research Associates, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and others whose weaponry can be tied to the utter devastation of World Trade Center. A possible silver lining over Texas: secrecy-gagged panelist Col. Dr. Bob Bowman valiantly tried to warn on the Austin-based nationally-syndicated Deadline Live radio program Friday that “Star Wars” is offensive weaponry designed to take out targets such as buildings from space-based platforms, sewing confusion in doing so. Labels: 9/11, directed-energy, disinformation, mockingbird, stj911 …..— |
|
