|
|
Archive for May, 2007
THE KISSINGER GAMBIT
Press For Truth Clip: Kissinger Vs. The 9/11 Families:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcxjJDlbnC4
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=734&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15
 Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fintan, I’m sure you are familiar with parapsychology research and precognition phenomena.While I find your analysis of The Coup cover to be worthy of consideration, how do you weigh the possibilities between a PsyOp and a PsiOp?I know at least 3 people who personally had what most would conisder precognitive dreams of 911 either the morning of the event or in weeks prior.
In my research on “911 fore-knowledge” I’ve found lots of evidence for paranormal and parapolitical presentiment of the attacks:
DreamPodcast #2 - Premonitions of 911:
http://www.elfis.net/phorum/read.php?f=3&i=44&t=44
Paranormal instances range from precog dreams, waking visions, to the parapsychological data from scientists like Dean Radin and the Global Consciousness Project folks at noosphere.princeton.edu and other examples. The previously mentioned album covers as well as other artistic expressions have also been noted.
Parapolitical instances of witnesses / evidence indicating probable fore-knowledge include parapolitical researcher John Judge’s fellow researcher and American Airlines stewardess, “T. Carter”, who says she saw the hijackers casing her plane before 911. The previously cited John Woods example has been around since 2002 and note that Woods was “rewarded” for his support of the MSM 911 Myth by his getting to play the role of Rudolph Gulliani in the post-911 made for tv movie about the mayor.
Anyway … here are a couple of posts I did some time back about the intersection of “real” precognitive 911 stuff and the possibilities inherant in the knowledge that Intel agencies have used both “real” and fake psychics as outlets for disinfo:
Re: The Lone Gunmen Prophecy
Hi Kenn (Thomas),
I absolutely agree with your assertion that these shows have stolen
ideas from the research of you and our mutual friends. Having worked
at the computer game company ORIGIN Systems ten years ago I know very
well that there are Forteans and ParaPolitically minded creative
types within the industry who get their inspiration from the pages of
yours and others books and research.
And I wasn’t suggesting one had to be psychic to precognitively grok
the planes into buildings meme. I was simply citing evidence that
suggests that psychics (whether real or fake) have been used as
intelligence assetts by the US Govt to seed disinfo and to gain info
from their confidantes and clients:
“Psychic Jeane Dixon Was FBI Stooge”
http://lists.village.virginia.edu/lists_archive/sixties-l/2335.html
[I have the archived html and FOIA docs saved at home)
I’m well aware of the pre-911 imagery and news reports involving
planes as missiles and planes into buildings:
“A man, drives a plane, into the Chrysler building” - Lyric from the
song “Is Chicago, Is Not Chicago” by the band Soul Coughing, released
in September 1994.
http://www.parapolitics.info/media/911podcast050826.mp3
Hip Hop Band THE COUP album cover (no planes)
http://www.elfis.net/images/911images/coup-cover-300.jpg
This suggestive German album cover (with planes near WTC)
http://www.elfis.net/images/911images/foreseeing_the_future.jpg
And this suggestive Pre-911 Computer game box fro “RED ALERT 2″
(with planes near WTC)
http://www.parapolitics.info/images/ra2box_0002pre911.jpg
The various pre 911 “WTC as Target” report covers
http://www.parapolitics.info/images/wtctargetpre911.jpg
The Austin, Texas based Steve Jackson Games pre 911 “Illuminati” card
game cards
http://www.parapolitics.info/images/911/WTCcardgame.jpg
http://www.parapolitics.info/images/911/wtcpentagoncardgame.jpg
And this cartoonists bit (not sure if this is pre 911)
http://www.parapolitics.info/images/911/wtc.gif
I’ve also seen pics of a calendar that was printed in Asia that
featured a drawing of a plane flying towards the twin towers and of
course there is this strange pic on a refridgerator in a GE advert
from an Italian magazine circa April 2001:
http://www.metatech.org/Images/ge-ad.gif
There was also the November 1993 Hustler Magazine pic obviously
inspired by the first WTC (FBI enabled) attack:
http://www.metatech.org/Images/WTC%20&%201993%20Hustler%20Mag.jpg
However, I am unaware of any Bruce Willis movies dealing with that
theme directly (The first Die Hard movie featured helicopters
accidentally slamming into buildings, as did The Matrix and other
films. Die Hard 2 featured the switching of transponders to cause
airliners to crash which is apparently an old intel trick).
SMiles
AND …
The thing about this Lone Gunmen pilot episode is that nearly
precisely mirrors at least one varient of the 911 conspiracy theory:
that the planes were remotely piloted in a false flag “terror attack”
whose impetus was American Police State and American Hegemony at the
behest of the MICkey Complex.
And according to actor Dean Haglund, he was told by Chris Carter that
a Hollywood psychic had fessed up to being used by Intel assets to
seed hollywood writers with script ideas:
“Haglund stated that after years of writing the X-files, the FBI and
NASA would approach Chris Carter with plots for stories. He also
discussed the fact that the CIA have since the 80’s hired informants
posting as psychics to attend Hollywood parties and report back the
the CIA on general trends and talking points.”
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/video/120105haglundteaserwmbb.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/151205deanhaglund.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/161205Haglund.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/301205deanhaglund.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2004/171204haglund.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/multimedia_priorknowledge_lonegumen.html
Recall also the news articles about psychic Jean Dixon being used by
the Intel community to seed disinformation …
AND …
The Precognitive Visions of ParaPolitical Researcher Alex Jones
Austin, Texas - Today marks only the second time this author has heard local radioshow host, parapolitical researcher and documentary filmmaker Alex Jones admit to his life-long history of prophetic, or precognitive, dreams.
http://www.elfis.net/2006/05/15.html
|
| Rumpl4skn wrote: |
| It suddenly all makes sense to me now. It’s all explainable by paranormal precognition.This is how the NeoCons knew about the ‘hijackings’ - they consulted psychics. No inside job, just inside information. And the multinationals don’t get advance market trend info from the monetary system handlers, they just ask Jean Dixon’s Granddaughter.Wow - there are just so many ways to innocently explain away these awful feelings I’ve had for the past 5 years. I can’t decide which one to wholeheartedly embrace first.
We can all go home now. No crime, no foul.  |
Rumpl4skn, I’m suggesting nothing of the sort.As someone who researches anomalous information transfer (aka ESP) I can’t help but ask these questions.
While I see the scientific evidence for psi phenomena to be real and convincing, I cited examples of claims of intel operatives using claimed psychics for intel purposes.
My point is … despite the intriguing info uncovered by Fintan about THE COUP cover, it may be just as likely that someone like Boots is a creative minded person familiar with COINTELPRO covert ops etc enough to put these items in place in the cover album and there is no real psyop here. Then again, it could very well be so. I’ve worked for musicians and computer game designers and they are into conspiracy research, paranormal phenomena etc etc. so it’s not unreasonable to think it is at least possible that that is all that is involved in these many instances.
And since Fintan is someone who advances metaphysical discussions with his TreeIncarnations ideas (http://breakfornews.com/forum/index.php?c=2) I didn’t think it was unreasonable or distracting to point out this other info.
SMiles
| Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:04 am Post subject: |
   |
|
| Rumpl4skn wrote: |
| elfis,Apologies if I was overly sarcastic there (I’m drinking half-decaf now). I’m just overloaded with the mind games I see being played in regards to 9/11, and I was (not so eagerly) awaiting when the paranormal card would be sincerely played, as I’m sure it will be increasingly used to pollute clear analysis, along with other non-debatable misdirections.
I’m not suggesting you did that. I just value the integrity of this forum, and I’m leery of seeing aliens, holocaust denial or Uri Gellerisms to enter into the equations - despite what I’ve seen as the “Occam’s Razor” justification of such tripe on other boards.
Call me old fashioned.  |
Thanks Rumpl4skn. I am fully aware of the dangers and fears of folks regarding the ingression of the paranormal and UFOs into the debate. But as someone who came to know ParaPolitics Blvd by way of the other back alley of “para” research I can’t help but draw upon those years of research in my exploration of these topics.
And I’ve been called a debunker and a believer by different folks in the same day … I’ve also been called a CIA agent on a few occassions but that comes with the territory.
I really like Fintan’s approach, ideas and analysis generally. I often recommend him to folks for a “non-CIA Fakes” perspective. But I still find much of his analysis lacking definitive evidence as it mostly often hinges upon interpretation of the end results of the items being analyzed and … dare I say it … like para phenomena such analysis can be easily dismissed by others less fluent in the big-picture or without a proper context and level of background knowledge.
Again, I try to keep my discussions of para subjects separate except when I decide to focus on either thru the lense of the other. But in the case of pre-conditioning imagery related to 911, as someone who studies “anomalies” I think it must be kept in mind that there ARE other possible factors at work that make difficult a definitive analysis of a supposed PsyOp like the COUP COVER unless we have extremely hard evidence for connections to psychological warfare operatives. Certainly Boots connections should be explored and certainly what Fintan has posted is suggestive of the need for further research.
But I often wonder what Fintan’s views are on other areas such as parapsychology, remote viewing, etc. since he has at least occassionally passed verdict on everything from the nature of reality (with his TreeIncarnation series) to Crop Circles*.
* = FIRST CONTACT: CHILBOLTON ET MESSAGE DECODED
24-27th August, 2001
http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/chilbolton_reply.htm
http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/chilbolton_1999.htm
http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/chilbolton_the_verdict.htm
WAS CHILBOLTON AN ET CONTACT? THE VERDICT.
by Fintan Dunne, coEditor PsyOpNews.com
6/7 September 2001
“With a military high-tech source unlikely, we turn in PART IV to the scalar techniques that an alien intelligence could have used to telepathically or mechanically beam the glyphs through hyperspace. Science fiction? Not, really. Based on our latest understanding of relativity and dark matter, its quite concievable. As we will see.
CONTINUED IN PART IV SHORTLY”
There was supposed to be a Part IV but then 911 happened and to my knowledge Fintan never completed that series. Fintan was going in some interesting directions … but perhaps this was just a prepatory piece before he busted the scam wide open a la the CIA FAKES ruse.
Anway … thanks for the apologies. I’m sorry if I wasn’t more clear about my interests or intent in adding to this thread.
SMiles
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:44 pm Post subject: Bush let’s slip about Controlled Misdirection, er Demolition |
|
|
I didn’t see this Friday press conference but … for what it’s worth, he apparently read from his script and …Bush went on to say that the operatives of the planned attacks were instructed in the placement of explosives. Adding, as though it’s the clearest thing in the world, that Khalid disclosed the explosives were to detonate at “a point high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.”
http://www.Rigint.blogspot.comWhiteHouse Transcript here:”For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high — a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.”
Transcript Source:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html
Looks like this 911Blogger has posted about it as well:
BUSH: planted EXPLOSIVES inside WTC!!
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html
500kB mp3 audio snippet
http://dc.indymedia.org/usermedia/audio/1/u2r2h–bush_explosives-15sep06.mp3
Real Media link to Bush’s Rose Garden Demolition Comments:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.v.html
Saturday, September 16, 2006
Secret Agent Man
There’s a man who leads a life of danger
To everyone he meets he stays a stranger
Parsing the statements of George Bush is of course handicapped by the man’s uncommon illiteracy, though when he sticks to his prepared texts we can get some indication of what his keepers want us to hear, even if Bush himself doesn’t know what he’s saying. Take, for one bizarre instance, the opening remarks to his Rose Garden news conference last Friday.
In defence of torture and secret prisons he boasted of the “valuable information” obtained by the CIA from waterboarding “men like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed” (whose telephone conversations with Mohammed Atta, including final approval for the attacks on September 10, are known to have been monitored and translated by the NSA, but apparently not acted upon).
<snip>
But back to Bush and his Friday remarks:
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high — a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.
Even allowing for the bell curve of his usual nonsense, what sense does this make?
The Guardian transcript has Bush saying that Khalid “described the design of plane attacks,” rather than the official “planned attacks.” The video, available from the White House website, confirms “planned.” Perhaps the Guardian couldn’t quite believe what it was hearing. Because Bush went on to say that the operatives of the planned attacks were instructed in the placement of explosives. Adding, as though it’s the clearest thing in the world, that Khalid disclosed the explosives were to detonate at “a point high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.”
Before we rush to judgement, believing Bush is letting it slip that the towers were demolished, watch the video. Bush isn’t riffing here; he isn’t straying from the prepared text. His remarks were crafted with care. So why would he be given such lines, which could so easily be construed by 9/11 skeptics as an inadvertant admission of controlled demolition? Perhaps because, as I believe was Rumsfeld’s intention when he “misspoke” of a “missile” striking the Pentagon the very week Thierry Meyssan launched his “no plane” website, that’s precisely where they want our attention, whether or not demolition is a fact. (And it will only be our attention, as the corporate press either don’t have the ears or the stomach for it.)
So here’s the scene: the White House invoking invisible man Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to excite our imagination with an oddly-worded statement strongly suggestive of demolition, when our attention would be better rewarded by considering Khalid himself, his service to the ISI and the ISI’s service to US intelligence. But Bush will never be written the words to encourage such thoughts.
Read entire post at www.Rigint.blogspot.com
posted by Jeff at 8:04 PM
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I often have used reference to the Northwoods docs as my entre to telling folks about 911 as Inside Job. However, I too have had my skeptical side piqued by the possibility that it could be purposeful mis/disinfo.I first heard about it via Bamford’s supposedly being tipped off to its existence by a friend and then his story of finding it in the archives.But as far as I know the only person to have written about it possibly being disinfo is Carol A. Valentine:
Operation Northwoods: The Counterfeit
by Carol A. Valentine
Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum
http://www.Public-Action.com
Copyright, October, 2001
Excerpt: “The reviews were well in circulation, but still fresh when 9-11 hit. In retrospect, Northwoods seemed like an eery premonition. I thought the release of the Northwoods revelations were indeed a timely coincidence. Because the Northwoods scenario seemed to fit the facts of 9-11, many writers cited Bamford and Northwoods. I was one of them.
But there is just one problem with Northwoods. Operation Northwoods was not written by Americans. Put in other words, Operation Northwoods documents were not written by the Pentagon. They are counterfeits.”
http://www.public-action.com/911/northwds.html
But just now … doing a little digging I find another article from the same period of time (October 2001) where the same author (Carol A. Valentine) is talking about (debuting ? starting pre Rumsfeld gaff?) the Global Hawk / No Plane at the Pentagon meme.
Even more interesting is the location of this article …
Fintan Dunne’s PsyOpNews.com site:
Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS
by nessie October 5 2001, Fri, 5:23pm
by Carol A. Valentine / Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum
http://eionews.addr.com/psyops/news/carolvalentine.htm
Also, can anyone confirm Jeff Wells’ assertion:
“And part of the cover-up of the Pentagon heist has been the no-plane shell game, played smartly by Rumsfeld himself who “misspoke” that a “missile” had struck the Pentagon the same week Thierry Meyssen’s original no-plane website was launched.”
http://rigint.blogspot.com/2006/06/flight-of-capital.html
Curiouser and curiouser…
SMiles
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not trying to hijack this thread but thought I’d answer my own question RE: Rumsfeld and Myssan’s Missile Theory originating in the same week:”It was first floated in early October 2001 by French author Thierry Meyssan and US War Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Monsieur Meyssan started a webpage that suggested a plane did not hit the Pentagon on October 7, and Rumsfeld gave an interview to Parade magazine on October 12 where he said a “missile” hit the Pentagon.”
http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.htmlAnyway … on the main subject of the thread, I am still searching for any other articles out there exploring the Operation Northwoods as disinfo sub-meme.
SMiles
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Haven’t listened to the audio for this post yet. Not sure I want to.Like so many others, I’d really like Fintan to follow thru with some evidence for his CIA Fakes list as well as a Non-CIA Fakes site list. I don’t think either is too much to ask for.
I certainly agree that most of the conspiracy sites out there are pushing FEAR but ya know what … fear is a valid human emotion that very often spurs people into action. It does get dull and draining day in and day out.
But that alone does not qualify a website as being a CIA fake.
As for this non-issue of PsyOps posters on RENSE dot com … Fintan, most of the posters you cite are from this very old gallery here:
http://homepage.mac.com/leperous/PhotoAlbum1.html
http://micahwright.com/bio.htm
So if you want to prove your contention that these posters are part of a PsyOp why don’t you start by finding actual evidence that their creator is now or once was an intel assett.
sMiles
|
| moylan wrote: |
| Quote: |
| They’re all facets of someone’s experience and worthwhile topics for discussion. |
That’s a value judgement, and not one with which many people would agree. They may strike some people as worthwhile topics for discussion, but not in the context of serious issues, which UFO sightings and abductions really aren’t.
If you think that “political rants” are going to do any good, there must be some delusion virus circulating.
|
Yeah, that’s why Fintan keeps his metaphysical stuff on http://www.treeincarnation.com and not http://www.breakfornews.com and why I generally encourage keeping them seperate on my own websites. However, there can be much cross-over; for instance, it was my research into UFOs that lead me to ParaPolitics. As you research the govt and mils reactions to UFOs you immediately become aware of govt cover-ups and conspiracy and PsyOps. As you go from strictly UFO related research to Close Encounters and Abduction phenomena you inevitably come up against information about the CIA’s MK-Ultra programs and from their it’s a hop-skip-and-jump to full blown parapolitical intrigue. So the two can easily be linked and related. I don’t necessarily fault websites for mixing the two. I would more likely fault a website for HOW they mix the subjects.
I really like a lot of Fintan’s work, both his parapolitical and metaphysical stuff. I just am getting tired of him not following through (enough for my tastes) on his assertions about his CIA Fakes List. The commentary I see about this list from his readers seems more balanced and informed than his “evidence”. Like several of his skeptical fans, I keep waiting for more of his “research” and “evidence” to back his assertions.
I certainly agree on others’ analyses of the Fear Factor being manipulated to keep people from becoming activists but I think that same Fear Mongering CAN and DOES often motivate people to get involved or to atleast start asking more questions about everything.
I live in Austin and I’ve met Alex Jones several times and am not convinced that he is a paid agent. To the contrary, I think he is all too human and prone to human foibles … as is Fintan, myself and everyone else attempting to grapple with this increasingly Twilight Zonish surReality we find ourselves in.
Peace Out!
SMiles
One final note …I had forgotten this interesting fact - Fintan himself has used at least one of this artist’s Propaganda Redux Posters (or at least the source material and same idea) on his own site for at least a few years now … since at least February of 2003:
http://web.archive.org/web/20030202134947/http://www.sickofdoctors.addr.com/
Goto Fintan Dunne dot com, scroll down to the Sick of Doctors website link.
http://www.fintandunne.com
There it is … you can click on the link to the Sick of Doctors website to see it again on that site’s entrance.
 
http://www.breakfornews.com/images/sickofdoctors.jpg
http://www.sickofdoctors.addr.com
http://www.sickofdoctors.addr.com/images/sickofdoctors.gif
You can find the image that Fintan used here:
http://homepage.mac.com/leperous/.cv/leperous/Sites/.Pictures/reporter.jpg-thumb_105_140.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/leperous/.Pictures/reporter.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/leperous/PhotoAlbum1.html
http://micahwright.com/bio.htm
So, I guess that makes Fintan a CIA FAKE and guilty of Fear Mongering PsyOps like Rense, Alex and the rest. <wink>
SMiles
“When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it.”
— Dwight David Eisenhower
“I fully understand that the intelligence was wrong,
and I’m just as disappointed as everybody else is.”
— George W. Bush, April 7, 2006
“I will not convene an accountability board
to judge the performances of any individual
CIA officers.” — J. Porter Goss
“Once a government is committed to the
principle of silencing the voice of
opposition, it has only one way to go, and
that is down the path of increasingly
repressive measures, until it becomes a
source of terror to all its citizens and
creates a country where everyone lives in
fear.”
— Harry S Truman
“It is the Iraqis’ country, 28 million of
them. They are perfectly capable of running
that country. . . . Our problem is that
anytime something needs to be done, we have a
feeling we should rush in and fill the vacuum
and do it ourselves.”
— Donald Rumsfeld, 29 November 2005
|
|
Filed Under (Memes) by admin on 05-05-2007
|
Empire State vs World Trade
After Sir Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post broke the story (which may or may not have been leaked by James Randi’s pal Willie Rodrieguez) that Charlie Sheen would be narrating an upcoming version of the 9/11 documentary Loose Change, Murdoch’s attack poodle O’Reilly had 9/11 suspect Bo Dietl on his program to attack Sheen.As cablecast on Fox Noise Channel Thursday:
Some background on Bo Dietl’s 9/11 connections:
 WNBC September 1, 2003:
“Can you send somebody over to the Woolworth Building to check the roof?” a Port Authority police officer asked. “There’s a possible … they said it was … we just had a second explosion, possibly a missile from the roof of the Woolworth Building.”
“The Woolworth Building?” replied a police operator.
“Yeah, on … on Broadway,” the officer said.
Transcripts created from tapes of Port Authority emergency calls and radio transmissions illustrate the utter disorientation caused by the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history.
“It’s a fire bomb,” one caller told authorities.
“A helicopter crash,” said a second man calling the Port Authority police.
“Possible aircraft explosion,” offered a PA police officer in another phone call.
The transcripts were released Thursday evening by the Port Authority, which owned the trade center, just two weeks before the second anniversary of the attack. The New York Times went to court to win their release.
—-
From Nico Haupt and Phil Jayhan on LetsRoll911.org forums:
From the NY POST (08-29-03):
“The Woolworth Building! The Woolworth Building! They’re shooting at the Trade Center from the Woolworth Building!” a police officer screams. … “There’s fucking explosions going off on Vesey street!” another officer yells.
Tom Modern looked into the biography of Richard “Bo” Dietl, who runs the Woolworth Building for Beau Dietl & Associates. He found out, that Dietl has advised the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia on issues of personal and physical site security and supervised security services provided for high-ranking officials from the Peoples Republic of China.
—-
Dylan Avery on LetsRoll911.org
Now add those reports together with the picture showing some sort of apparent bomb damage, the bright flash, and now this video found on Terrorize.dk, only confirming once again, that something horrific happened at the top of the WW building. Watch until you see the wisp of what appears to be a vapor trail coming from directly above the flash.
The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 (Hardcover)
by Lawrence Wright (Author)
Discovery of directed 9/11 dialectic
 Recent research reveals the WTC “controlled demolition” debate has been a constructed Hegelian dialectic since no later than 9/12 2001. For it was on that day that one Van Romero, of New Mexico Tech, announced in the local Albuquerque Journal that the Twin Towers were obviously taken out by a conventional controlled demolition. Romero quickly and quietly retracted his claim and disappeared from the scene. What was not revealed until now however, is that Romero is a major player in directed-energy weaponry, and a long time member of the Directed-Energy Professional Society (See 911researchers.com). By planting the “controlled demolition” meme, Romero took eyes away from exotic and specifically directed-energy weapons’ role in the destruction of the World Trade Center Complex.How serendipitious, then, that Romero should also resurface this very weekend on the Discovery Channel of all places. Romero received special thanks for, and his Department presided over, something called “Conspiracy Test” — an examination of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
As OKBOMB is increasingly understood as 9/11 writ small, cursory reexamination yields the telltale signs of directed-energy weapons there too — the powderized concrete, cylindrical cut-out patterned damage, and even scorch marks left on the roof by the earlier prototype of the weapon. Romero’s constructed dialectic eschewed such anomalies however, restricting the acceptable frame of debate to truck-bomb vs column-bomb.
So it should be little surprise then that even as Romero’s documentary premiered on Discovery, Discovery cameras were in Austin, Texas to tape a purportedly scientific presentation hewing to a similarly circumscribed 9/11 debate. For, as a result of an elaborate and targeted psychological operation aimed at leaders of the “patriot” community in the Austin area, the leading “scientific” figure speaking at the University of Texas conference came from the same 33o exo-weaponry milieu as Romero.
Thus, any presentation by Discovery will be similarly restricted, between the ridiculous official theory(/ies) and the equally ludicrous “superthermate” theory. Such false opposition keeps activists’ heads spinning on an untraceable thermite goose chase rather than agitating for grand-jury investigations of institutions such as Raytheon, Applied Research Associates, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and others whose weaponry can be tied to the utter devastation of World Trade Center.
A possible silver lining over Texas: secrecy-gagged panelist Col. Dr. Bob Bowman valiantly tried to warn on the Austin-based nationally-syndicated Deadline Live radio program Friday that “Star Wars” is offensive weaponry designed to take out targets such as buildings from space-based platforms, sewing confusion in doing so.
Labels: 9/11, directed-energy, disinformation, mockingbird, stj911
…..—
…..| Posted at 13:32 | PERMA-LINK | Feedback? | (1) comments
|
|
Recent research reveals the WTC “controlled demolition” debate has been a constructed Hegelian dialectic since no later than 9/12 2001. For it was on that day that one Van Romero, of New Mexico Tech, announced in the local Albuquerque Journal that the Twin Towers were obviously taken out by a conventional controlled demolition. Romero quickly and quietly retracted his claim and disappeared from the scene. What was not revealed until now however, is that Romero is a major player in directed-energy weaponry, and a long time member of the Directed-Energy Professional Society (See 911researchers.com). By planting the “controlled demolition” meme, Romero took eyes away from exotic and specifically directed-energy weapons’ role in the destruction of the World Trade Center Complex.How serendipitious, then, that Romero should also resurface this very weekend on the Discovery Channel of all places. Romero received special thanks for, and his Department presided over, something called “Conspiracy Test” — an examination of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
